transfer This domain can be transferred the UDRP core rules have been satisfied infringes-mark yes no-legitimate-interest yes bad-faith yes transfer yes the Respondent didn't respond to the UDRP complaint, indicating a lack of legitimate interest in the domain response no no-legitimate-interest yes the Respondent is acting in bad faith via squatting squatter yes bad-faith yes the Respondent is acting in bad faith via typo squatting typosquatter yes bad-faith yes the Respondent is acting in bad faith via disruption disruptor yes bad-faith yes the Respondent is acting in bad faith via hording camper yes habitual-camper yes bad-faith yes the Respondent is acting in bad faith by causing confusion confuser yes source-confuser yes commercial-confuser yes bad-faith yes the Respondent is making noncommercial use of the domain legitimate-fair-maybe-noncommercial yes legitimate-fair-maybe yes the Respondent is making fair use of the domain legitimate-fair-maybe-noncommercial no legitimate-fair-maybe-fairuse yes legitimate-fair-maybe yes the Respondent is not making fair use of the domain legitimate-fair-maybe-noncommercial no legitimate-fair-maybe-fairuse no legitimate-fair-maybe no the Respondent is not making fair use of the domain because he/she is diverting legitimate-fair-maybe yes legitimate-fair-divert yes legitimate-fair no the Respondent is not making fair use of the domain because he/she is tarnishing legitimate-fair-maybe yes legitimate-fair-tarnish yes legitimate-fair no the Respondent is making fair use of the domain legitimate-fair-maybe yes legitimate-fair-divert no legitimate-fair-tarnish no legitimate-fair yes the Respondent is certainly not making fair use of the domain legitimate-fair-maybe no legitimate-fair no the Respondent was making a bona fide offering of goods or services legitimate-commercial-active yes legitimate-commercial yes the Respondent was preparing to make a bona fide offering of goods or services legitimate-commercial-active no legitimate-commercial-prepare yes legitimate-commercial yes the Respondent has no commercial interest in the domain legitimate-commercial-prepare no legitimate-commercial-active no legitimate-commercial no the Respondent is using the domain in commercial competition with the Complainant legitimate-commercial yes legitimate-commercial-compete yes legitimate-commercial-nocompete no the Respondent is not making commercial use of the domain legitimate-commercial no legitimate-commercial-nocompete no the Respondent is not a commercial competitor with the Complainant legitimate-commercial yes legitimate-commercial-compete no legitimate-commercial-nocompete yes the Respondent has no legitimate interest in the domain response yes legitimate-commercial-nocompete no legitimate-known-as no legitimate-fair no no-legitimate-interest yes the Respondent is infringing on the Complainant's mark registered-mark yes confusingly-similar yes infringes-mark yes udrp-db:NoInterest=True no-legitimate-interest yes udrp-db-0True udrp-db:PastBonaFide=True legitimate-commercial-active yes udrp-db-2True udrp-db:FutureBonaFide=True legitimate-commercial-prepare yes udrp-db-3True udrp-db:KnownBy=True legitimate-known-as yes udrp-db-4True udrp-db:NonCommercialUse=True legitimate-fair-maybe-noncommercial yes udrp-db-5True udrp-db:FairUse=True legitimate-fair-maybe-fairuse yes udrp-db-6True udrp-db:NoMark=True registered-mark no udrp-db-aTrue udrp-db:RegMarks=True registered-mark yes udrp-db-7True udrp-db:ConfusingSimilar=True confusingly-similar yes udrp-db-8True udrp-db:ConfusingSimilar=false confusingly-similar no udrp-db-9True udrp-db:BFSell=True squatter yes udrp-db-10True udrp-db:BFPreventUse=True camper yes habitual-camper yes udrp-db-11True udrp-db:BFDisrupt=True disruptor yes udrp-db-12True udrp-db:BFConfusion=True confuser yes udrp-db-13True squatter Was the domain registered primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the registration to the Complainant or a competitor for valuable consideration in excess of registration costs yes no typosquatter Was the domain registered as an intentional misspelling of words, intended to intercept and siphon off traffic from its intended destination yes no camper Was the domain registered in order to prevent the mark owner from having a domain for his mark yes no habitual-camper Does the Respondent habitually register domains in order to prevent mark owners from having a domain for their marks yes no disruptor Was the domain registered primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor yes no confuser Was the domain intended to attract users by creating confusion using the Complainant's mark yes no source-confuser Was the confusion designed to make people think that the Respondent endorsed or was affiliated with the web site or products on it yes no commercial-confuser Was the confusion for commercial gain yes no response Did the Respondent respond to the complaint yes no legitimate-commercial-active Before any notice of the dispute, was the Respondent using the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services yes no legitimate-commercial-prepare Before any notice of the dispute, was the Respondent preparing to use the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services yes no legitimate-commercial-compete Is the bona fide offering of goods or services an offering of products that compete with the Complainant's yes no legitimate-known-as Is the Respondent commonly known by the domain name yes no legitimate-fair-maybe-noncommercial Is the Respondent making legitimate noncommercial use of the domain name yes no legitimate-fair-maybe-fairuse Is the Respondent making fair use of the domain name yes no legitimate-fair-divert Does the Respondent intend to commercially gain by misleadingly diverting customers yes no legitimate-fair-tarnish Does the Respondent intend to commercially gain by tarnishing the mark at issue yes no registered-mark Does the Complainant have a trademark or service mark registered with the USPTO or similar organization which is identical to the disputed domain name, not including any punctuation or top-level domains (e.g. hyphens or ".com") yes no confusingly-similar Is the contested domain identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's mark? Note that the addition of top-level domains, typographical marks (such as hyphens), removal of spaces, alteration of pluralisation, and reliance on typos (such as prepending "www" to the mark), or adding a generic term (e.g. "hotel" or "online") will not prevent a name from being confusingly similar to a mark. yes no